How come indeed a smoke ban was not unconstitutional at even pretence? And what have certain politicians respected from their right to be elected from that of others and the rest if everyone can do as they please so long as they win the election having that right?
The Irish constitution is or at least has been renowned as one of the fairest existent constitutions owing to its verses recognising the life of an unborn child having equal rights to its life with the people who already exist. This has been withdrawn under the common consent of its people and that of a referendum they conducted returning in favour of generalised or fully broad abortion laws and legislation.
Let the remark be made clear that abortion laws just like any type of other law or legislation designates what is wrong and defines since when separates this from what is right to be followed. With this said abortion laws or their perpetration exist to the expense of the next generation and must be followed in their initial social formalisation to avoid doing so.
The Irish redrafted laws separating and differentiating right from wrong adding the condition that five months have to undergo to have an abortion but that is known to science and not the law as the same condition on feasibility and just because something is feasible it does not mean that it can also happen in the fashion of the Irish choosing their actions in respect to the abortions from what is available to them.
This constitutional and legal amendment cancelled out all previous moral and effective conditions and appended abortions on their feasibility from the starting point of having some of the fairest constitutions in the world out of the previous reason. What was an incentive or main motive to drive default rebellion in place of an essentialised need?
- Withdrawing the renouncement of the constitution from belonging to the British Isles in sight of the proximity of the horizon for a person on assuming the position of their freedom.
- Asserting whether an unborn child is developing inherited rights to betray this to the judge who will decide affected on the gynaecologist and positioning they will not be accepted under equal terms in society including its narrowest detriment constituting the family as a means of imminent revolt in its presently stretching continuation.
- Securing the key to other forms and variations of discrimination (racial, social, individual or personal) from effective discrimination in between the sexes having an excuse or being resultant in the autonomy of female reproduction henceforth named multiplication and pursuing punitive confrontation towards dissidence of the ‘exceptions to the rule’ as people and their backgrounds while strategically securing the controlling key.
Moving from left to right or downwards from the first and Irish smoke ban in 2004 to the proposed Scottish independence let’s note that Scotland would not equally be contrasted to a foreign nation in the way it can be to England and be separated from England or from Great Britain having the same nationality with Wales and with Ireland to retain its national identity that this refers to in the first place. Then what could be motivating the quest of its independence and its separatist emotive? The fact that Mary Stewart descends or neither in the royal family always gives rise to ballots!
The Irish ended up capable of less after completing the rebellion of their independent state or country since they were deprived of their ability to smoke independently as a consequence of the formation of their state and imposed so on Scotland then to England or the rest of the world in imitating their act of none hospitability. Meaning in war.
But if the Irish constitution cannot be respected by its people or elected representatives and at the least out of its cause or what had been upvoted in 2004 could not do so from England, Scotland as well as from Wales alike Northern Ireland as the beholders the same nationality the British Constitution of 1215 can be imposed and respected by all across the rest of the world who raised the false flag and caused it to British politicians who are misguided by it until Boris Johnson came into power.
The Magna Carta in 1215 addresses the Lords with salutation to be unaccepting instructions originating from the electorate from having no reciprocal meaning. What applies for the Lords can apply to the general public in reciprocation regardless of which of them smoke or do not smoke which is not reciprocated in its righteous effect.
Hence in implication demanding instructions superfluously followed by salutation of the Lords is unconstitutional and is the smoking ban and the cigars they consume and this has to be brought into light and high publicity and gain the momentum to be made redundant as a condition of the law that is immediate.
Moreover the politicians in question and in raising the false flag have to be brought down to justice pertaining to the exact meaning and interpretation of their actions in regarding that from elsewhere holding contributors accountable for promoting the expense of the social initiative and conception of an enjoyment of the returning effect.
Laws are drafted and voted consulting and complying to the constitution of the same state from those responsible in power adequately to know in advance of their actions in the authorship while the constitution can be followed in place of the law and guide and misguide us through the formulation towards civil disobedience and demands.
Bring Back Smoking Freedom 