Three principles that counteract with anti-smoking fanaticism are namely the following essential rules:
- Politicians’ compliance to the constitution of the nation they are ruling. This is exactly the opposite from what the purpose of writing it down has been.
- ‘The means do not justify the ends.’
- Problems are being solved and not taken out of their causes.
Anybody else still having a question as to what is right or wrong in this case must raise their hand in parliament and speak for themselves! They will have joined the so many! The rest would then clash with direct not indirect democracy in its determination.
Oh, yes, prime minister David Cameron who since still disagrees with plain packaging was not only an MP to be confronted as one by his position from the Health minister Jane Ellison, MP to openly address parliament with the other MPs under his disagreement. How does that twist to be true and how come all this is not unconstitutional? Only one God knows how it has been decided in precision for what in specific to purpose. It is officially termed as a false flag when a nation or entity perform and enact someone else’s decision taken by the third parties who shaped it such as the W.H.O. or the Danish public health statistician corporations and harsh self-proclaimed charities or pharmaceutical companies’ influence about their objectives.
Bring Back Smoking Freedom 