Comment in response to the constitutional crime of proposing adult smoking prohibition

I agree with Pat Nurse and her comment above, and what about our mental health, is this not part of our health as well, because people who are ordered about with the exchange of blackmail are not mentally healthy if their actions are not a result of their free will, so why is mental health disregarded to its exclusion from physical health since general health is both mental and physical, and those are the two components that make up our health.

Those freaks must realise and learn that health is composite, mental and physical, and the purpose of mental health or our psychology is not served by executing commands originating from elsewhere, in fact issuing commands to people is attacking their mental well-being and their psychological welfare and is attacking them as people and individuals and should not be allowed for others to do, and that means nobody.

People who want to smoke inside who refrain to do so, who exchange taxes instead of the production cost of 20 or 25 cigarettes, who feel like doing something new but are told it is not allowed for them to try on their own, are not healthy in general because of their mental health and the mentality of a slave that is inspired towards them. The mind should be healthy in a healthy body, the ancient Greeks used to say. If one of the two is not healthy then the person succumbs to his health.

This draft law should not meet any MP’s approval, and it will be voted for by Labour communists who derive pleasure from eliminating others who have the habit of captivating their political opponents, by enslaving them not to be able to smoke on their own, in order to conquer their spirit and discipline to nothing and enslave somebody else. Society does not approve of what they do because it does not meet our consent of the majority, and what they decide on their own is not a social rule that has to be followed.

It is not punishable to smoke inside or buy cigarettes from an adult with legal responsibility or print decorations on product wrappers from a producer or manufacturer, so why should it become punishable because of the propostered will of one individual if it is not punishable by anybody else?

A fact is a fact and a fact should be respected in the right and the same way, not be made up by somebody’s actions which are not facts themselves, who pervert reality with people’s lack of actions under the exchange of blackmail. Fact has it that what they already currently punish by law enacting the exchange of blackmail is not a punishable event by anybody else in general who would have been its victims. It is only punished by the police on its own without being punished by any victim of what got punished, not exchanging the punishment with the consequence of a responsibility or anything else that would be guilty because it is innocent, and that is the real crime that is involved that violates the state constitution.

Because punishing innocent actions that underlie no guilt is enacted to the expense of the punished individual who is not at fault and is against him or her constituting a constitutional crime acted out by politicians, by MPs and by Rishi Sunak as well.

If this draft law gets approved by the majority of the parliament, despite the majority of the people, it should be challenged in court bringing up correctly targeted and consistent arguments, aiming at cancelling its validity and enforcement. The King should not sign it either, and I know that he would do so unawaringly.

Commented under http://taking-liberties.squarespace.com/blog/2024/2/1/the-prime-ministers-illiberal-legacy.html