The majority disagrees with public smoking bans and the evolvement of the anti-smoking campaign and that is only according to polls. When decisions are taken they should be made collectively and not individually from a member or a narrow group of people. When what’s happening meets the opposition of the majority it should not proceed and in this case should not have proceeded in the first place.

70% of people in Britain are opposed to a comprehensive smoking ban, with 6% of them being in favour of rather comprehensive smoking rights and the rest with some type of intermediate compromise, so what is taking place imposes itself on the majority and has been agreed on by the minority of those it concerns and affects. This is simply unacceptable and undemocratic and it should be reversed by meaning that for as soon as possible.

Electronic substitutes are not the only alternative for keeping your health from smoking, there are also invented R&D tobaccos that are used for R&D cigarettes with less substantial tar contained, let alone less nicotine which is easier to achieve. The choice between all these types of products must be performed through their selection in a free market environment with progress and free and not constrained development. There should be less or no fear of people going back or forth towards one of these types of products when they are R&D tobacco processed cigarettes.