Facing the war against smoking the state and its citizens should prefer peace. The law should only exist to regulate that smoking is only open to adults so that underage people do not practise it, and that it must only consist of tobacco and no other substances to prevent the consumption of psychoactive substances, not to have the form of a smoking ban that may foresee the consumption of illicit drugs as long as it is performed outdoors as it says. That is what the law regarding smoking is needed for. And that is what it should set as the minimum requirement in literal terms that should only be demanded by legislation. The rest that is demanded by the unconstitutional smoking ban are covered by the national constitution of each state and are not under the legitimate jurisdiction of punishable law itself but under that of the constitution that guarantees our rights and our civil liberties.
Irresponsible use of punishable laws by referring to the abuse of power of some health secretary who chosen to punish smokers is prohibited to occur and be performed by anyone else including themselves. It took place to the expense of those who smoke as well as indirectly to that of each other citizen and is prohibited by the constitution to be demanded through punishable laws.
Rights are guaranteed not by the laws that apply but the constitution that overlooks the government and should be respected by the law and recognised for all citizens.
Some health secretary demonstrates their ignorance about the meaning of the word ‘initiative’ for the initiative to smoke in comparison to the initiative to walk and to move which must differ from each other and not exist for the same reason, demonstrates their ignorance for the concept of logical consequence because the former is not derived upon the latter, and demonstrate their ignorance about the difference between a rule that bans smoking out of the derivation of need and a law that should not punish the various rules that exist applied locally to petrol stations and other danger-zones, as it currently does unjustly so, so as that laws are not in turn perceived as rules.
Bring Back Smoking Freedom 