Comment on the usefulness of vaping

What is there to know about vaping that’s new other than it isn’t the same person’s choice to practise it, but they do it because they have been told by others because someone else finds out for you that smoking is harmful instead of yourself.

Smoking being harmful is knowledge that comes out of somebody else who has been paid to find out. The same person’s choice is therefore to still smoke normal cigarettes like a normal person. Vapers use vaping because they have been told by others that smoking is harmful and want to protect their health so as to have been told by others to vape instead of smoke. Doing as you are told by others instead of what you tell yourself is harmful to your freedom and liberty, on the other hand, and that is what is harmful to our freedom and liberty, the entire anti-smoking campaign. The free will of those vapers when expressed freely is to smoke normal cigarettes like a normal person. They don’t really want to vape instead of smoking, and if smoking was safe they would still be doing it.

Vaping was invented and is available as a real choice for someone, not only because you have been told to vape instead of smoke by somebody else. The rise of the anti-smoking campaign and its whole evolution is a factor that undermines what this choice would have been. And we can’t find out what is really happening from its abstraction. There can be no polls that are answered sincerely without the prejudice of the respondent when prejudice and the same preoccupation is all around.