Written laws apply social rules to life and society has defined the content of those written laws along with the need imposing their enforcement and implementation. All written laws that govern social relationships are also the corresponding social rule. That is, almost all until more recently, since there has been a smoking ban and other counter-smoking legislation along with COVID restrictions and the circulation of the Euro in the Schengen zone, none of which comprise of any previously approved social rule applied to society but impose the will of one individual to all the rest.
The state legislating on its own without society is a mistake and a form and expression of fascism. This happens because it punishes actions and activities that are not guilty instead of innocent and abuses the punishment of the law and the control it has over both to avoid and exclude what they haven’t chosen for others to do, artificially yet not organically.
Let us bring the example of indoor smoking and the use of trade marks as registered intellectual property for tobacco products none of which is guilty to perform but innocent to do, without bringing about consequences pertaining to the responsibility of each individual who has the inalienable right to engage in those activities.
And lately, the government is using the parliament like a dictatorship would do, to raise the minimum age required to buy tobacco as an increasing variable to eradicate smoking, and is using the law to do so because it gets punished and therefore disciplines each citizen to the same uniform model of behaviour.
In other words, the state and the government is deceiving society by legislating in its absence and applying binary logic to manipulate the members of parliament who are required to accept or reject scripted commands that are issued towards the rest. For example, the referendum vote to accept or reject Brexit is not a question of binary logic in contrast to the vote to accept or reject a smoking ban and a generational smoking ban in parliament which is an application of binary logic. This binary logic prompt is given with issuing unnegotiable commands in writing which cannot be negotiated as given within parliament rather than be accepted or rejected.
And because voting for binary logic does not make any sense the result is a provocative violation of the laws of reason which clearly are not applied when writing the laws of man. They say that they “will make it an offence” to do this or that as if they have been given the choice between the two when they actually come true to happen. No, it is not an offence but it is a lie to say so instead and those subjected to the possibility of punishment for the same reason which has been publicly falsified in front of everyone listening are not at fault for smoking inside etc. which is why they should not be punished to do so when exercising their rights.
Bring Back Smoking Freedom 