5 issues about State-derived profits from smoking inexcusable as making an income

This passage would have been titled “Four missed points with tobacco overpricing” but its present title doesn’t give any justification of what the point could be! Always referring to puritan politics and policy control of politics,

1. How can they expect to understand the concept of economy correctly when one is being deprived of their chance to economise on their purchased needs?
2. How can they expect to exchange a five pound banknote under the principle of goods exchanges for that banknote and collect it instead of its circulation and exchange and distribute public services like education, health and public roadworks and constructive infrastructure out of the use of smokers who were disproportionately paying their taxes irrespective of the value of exchange?
3. Since what is the difference in between profit, price, and cost and its value
4. and how could these prices not be tuples because of the profit rather than the duty tax?
5. and why does the state unevenly attempt to benefit financially from those who smoke and evenly distributes the money taxed in comparison among the rest?

As a starting point of negotiation U.K. and other cigarette so-called prices of their cost should adopt to being £6.99 at most and follow inflation after freezing the rise towards £7.20 for at least one or two years and this is compensated in the common benefit.

The current concept of state-derived profit out of the use of smoking from its customers is inexcusable for them to supply its income out of arbitrarily-set taxes un-synchronous to the circulation of the same amounts of money and their laboured exchange. The purpose of duty tax is to be added and not to be multiplied in disproportion.