Forest U.K. Chairman Simon Clark confronted smoking abolition supporter Rebecca Jane representing the mental health sector from RJ8 on GB News when both were interviewed with Mark Dolan. It was made clear by Simon Clark that smoking benefits mental hygiene in contrast to her profession for advocating its complete abolition.
It was successfully brought up by both the TV presenter and interviewer Mark Dolan and Simon Clark that illicit drugs would hence be sold legitimately under the same hypothesis while tobacco cigarettes would be missing from the market. This was one of the highlights of the interview. Another had been that mental health benefits from smoking to the contrary of physical health led to its detriment. To this Rebecca Jane reacted with censorship by criticising the idea that Simon Clark was mentioning. She said that the idea was not suitable to be conveyed to the public. However, she may be aware that freedom of speech meets the opposite of censorship. One more was the notion that you cannot project the way smoke dissolves into the atmosphere to define human interaction and activities from the ground. Simon said that this is negligible for others to experience while RJ8 leader Rebacca Jane said that they remain affected.
Comments have been addressed in person to the staging of the show at GB News at GB Views as follows:
Dear GB News,
I would like to comment on Forest Association’s Chairman Simon Clark’s demised confrontation with the leader of RJ8 Rebecca Jane who supports imposing the law on those who smoke because they smoke so they can smoke no more from the market.
My opinion would be, how morbid to be publicly suggesting the deprivation of our liberty which is in favour of nothing – neither health nor money.
Speaking of health the RJ8 leader Rebecca Jane was properly alerted to the fact that mental health is influenced positively by smoking unlike physical health that is influenced negatively to the exact contrary and who has to learn once more that health is composite consisting of both physical and mental health to be able to think more rationally than what went on?
What she supports comes into conflict with her actual duties in her job; Mrs. Jane is a mental health executive and she should know that mental health is a component and that smoking benefits it to the extent of having to say so or admit it as well; the mentally ill tend to smoke to participate in society in a way that is proximate than any other and their spiritual condition is hugely impacted by seeking escape from psychological discomfort and pressure they otherwise feel helpless to confront.
At this point Mrs. Jane censored the message and Simon Clark’s free speech that this was told from and suggested that this should not be known or this idea should not be inspired to the public and talked about.
This is most typical of projected personalities making use of the inflexibility of the law to pierce people and their lives, penetrate their private lives and coerce them with their owned property. No you could not hide not one bit of what Simon had to say.
The RJ8 leader implied that mentioning that smoking dissolves into the atmosphere because it is smoke is comparable to what happens to you on the ground. And that because of that this must also depend on us to decide on. What we do ourselves is not where the smoke ends on its way up.
Thank you for accepting my comments that are on Mark Dolan’s interview.
Yours faithfully
Costas Kitis, BA
Bring Back Smoking Freedom 